Which of the following is NOT a benefit of effective sanitation practices?

Effective sanitation practices offer numerous benefits that contribute positively to both community health and economic stability. Enhanced public health is a direct result of good sanitation, as it reduces the spread of diseases, which can be prevalent in areas with inadequate sanitation facilities. This improved health leads to decreased healthcare costs and a healthier population capable of contributing to society.

Increased productivity is also a significant benefit of effective sanitation. When communities have access to proper sanitation, individuals are less likely to fall ill, leading to fewer sick days and greater productivity at work or school. This productivity boost can translate into economic benefits for businesses and the community as a whole.

Improved economic growth is another by-product of maintaining effective sanitation standards. When sanitation is prioritized, it attracts investments and enhances the overall quality of life, making the area more appealing for tourism and business development.

In contrast, higher levels of soil contamination represent a negative outcome and are not consistent with the goals of effective sanitation practices. Poor sanitation can lead to contaminants in the soil, which can affect agricultural productivity and public health, resulting in adverse repercussions for the economy and community well-being. Therefore, when assessing the benefits of effective sanitation, it is clear that increased soil contamination does not fit the positive narrative established by the other options.